Friday, March 7
Oddly, I remember being worried about Iraq at least a year before Desert Storm. I can place this Desert Storm was when I was in third grade, and this memory is from Highland Elementary, standing on the playground looking west [I was at Highland Elem from preschool through first semester of second grade, Buchannan Elem third through fifth, and some place random for the semester in between]. Anyway, a helicopter flew overhead, likely for the hospital, and I thought of Iraq and bombs and of the idea of kneeling on the ground covering my head. It's strange that I thought of Iraq. Admittedly, this would have been right in the middle of the time when my two favorite tv shows were M*A*S*H and McGuyvor, so war and danger intruding into America seemed like they could be part of my life. Most of what I remember from Desert Storm itself is watching the TV news: advancing maps, SCUD missiles, and gas masks.
posted by Amanda Butler |
3/07/2003 09:03:00 PM
Comment </noscript>
Thursday, March 6
I went to go hear Geoffrey Stone give his thoughts on Civil Liberties in Wartime earlier tonight. Stone is a professor at Chicago Law, former dean of the Law School, and Provost of the University before that. His talk began with the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798; moved forward through Lincoln suspending the writ of habeus corpus during the Civil War, sedition in WWI, and Japanese internment camps in WWII; and ended with a question and answer, much about today's situation . What follows is from the brief notes I took at his talk, mostly paraphrases with a few (hopefully accurate) quotes thrown in.
What troubles him the most about today's administration is its homogeneity. There's no one analogous to Attorney General Biddle, who opposed (unsuccessfully) internment camps [FDR, he Stone thinks, wasn't too fond of them either, but saw granting the camps a way to pacify the Asia-First crowd so he could direct more military attention to the European front.]. Eighteen months ago, when Ashcroft proposed TIPS, Stone was particuarly bothered that no one in the White House spoke out to say this is a bad idea: we tried spying on each other in WWI and that was an awful mistake [me: I'm not sure what precise WWI event Stone's referrring to].
He does think the present administration is insensitive to questions of civil liberty and worries of how little information is provided to the American people: "I don't believe there's any internal debate about these issues." As a nation, however, he thinks we're doing better on civil liberties than in any of the previous times he discussed. America doesn't tend to repeat the same mistakes -- Lincoln didn't try to get a sedition act, and although Wilson was pressured by some to suspend habeus corpus, he never did; it's just that we find novel ways to mess up. "There are a lot of things to be positive about. The one thing there isn't is the government, and that's a real problem." In praise, he did point out approvingly Bush's exhortation immediately following September 11th to behave normally and kindly towards their Arab-American and Muslim-American neighbors.
He also noted that the lack of information the public has makes it quite hard to dissent or protest. It's hard to say the detention of someone is illegal or immoral if you don't know why they're being detained, or who they are, or what their conditions are, or what types of military trials they might be receiving.... Stone criticized the executive for some of hte opportunistic things it smuggled into the USA Patriot Act that have nothing to do with terrorism, but are just powers the exec brancha has wanted for a long time [me: no, I'm not sure what these powers are, but chances are, I don't like them, just a guess]. He doesn't have a problem with the portion of the Patriot Act requiring registration by male citizens, age 16 and older, from Iraq or the Middle East who are living in the US. Evidently, in 1940, the US passed a law requiring all foreign nationals to register. It was one of those things you went down and did at the post office every year or three years. He remembes seeing ads on the TV reminding non-citizens to go register. I got the impression this registration wasn't abused then; otherwise, I think he would have mentioned it. Stone sees non-citizens as guests who can be asked this without triggering constitutional worries, and has no problem with registration so long as it is simply registration and nothing more.
One person asked, how or when does the war on terrorism end? The question becomes, how or when does a rhetoric end? In one of Bush's first speeches, he made the incredibly strategic move of calling terrorism a war that would go on for a lifetime. This statement was by no means self-evident, but in the times and situation, it was accepted and became imbedded. Stone thinks the "moment with Iraq has not been adequately explained" to the American people: you don't go to war with the people 50% behind you and 50% not.
You can also find Stone's own words on this topic in a brief 16 February 2003 piece for the Chicago Tribune.
posted by Amanda Butler |
3/06/2003 11:25:00 PM
Comment </noscript>
Wednesday, March 5
Kitty litter and oozing creosote --
When I went to downtown to the 7th Court of Appeals and heard Judge Posner give oral arguments in January, this was one of the cases heard. It's nothing remarkable: a railway worker building a bridge slipped; his foot fell a full 21 inches through the ties. He sued CSX Railway, alledging an unsafe working environment. The court ruled that sure it was dangerous -- they're on a bridge 131 feet up in the air replacing ties -- the danger was fully known to everyone, no negligence by the company, the worker admitted he wasn't paying close attention to his footing when he fell.
The highlight of the case was the joy the judges took in saying the words "kitty litter," repeating them any time they could. [Workers lay sawdust, or dirt, or ... kitty litter on the ties in hot weather to keep them from becoming slippery from the creosote that seeps out of the ties]. It's a fun phrase to say, I'll admit, rolling off the tongue with a quick one-two motion, and leaving the face with a hinting smile like saying "ice" or "cheese" for a photographer. Shocking scandal! Discussing kitty litter in public! Like little boys enjoying their transgressions. And after the novelty of that evaporated, they tried out "ooze" for a while, describing the effects of hot summers on the creosote-treated wooden ties. Oooozzze. yeah, man, that's a good word.
Anyway, to be thorough, thanks to Will Baude (also downtown in court that day) for pointing out that How Appealing had mentioned the case here, quoting its pretty good opening. And the full five pages of the opinion are available here [02-2724; Darrough, Roger v. CSX Transportation].
posted by Amanda Butler |
3/05/2003 09:51:00 AM
Comment </noscript>
Tuesday, March 4
It's time the University took down the orange signs bragging that in 1999, the Princeton Review ranked the Student Counseling and Resource Service here #1 in the nation.
A student committed suicide this Friday; another committed suicide at the beginning of winter.
For more information or thoughts about the recent tragedy, try here and here . It seems now that one death became two in the rumors. In reply to the latter post: I don't dispute that Chicago cares about its students; I do wonder if it could care more competently. I've heard people say they found the SCRC cold and unhelpful. I'll just reference the old Nightline debate to say I wish the University hadn't shut it down (the University worried that the students staffing it weren't trained well enough to handle crises). I don't mean to imply that Nightline would have prevented anything; it's just that the University's actions when it abruptly shut down the service didn't inspire very many positive thoughts about how the University treated its students.
"She died of a failure of analysis." -- The Book of Daniel, by E.L. Doctorow, describing how Daniel's sister killed herself after no one, not even her psychologist (a quack), understood her.
UPDATE: More information is available in today's edition of the Chicago Maroon , not yet updated online. His name was James Koehn. According to Katie Callow-Wright, Director of Undergraduate Student Housing, the University's first open and official response to a student death is the same response provided to all members of the community: the flag is lowered to half-mast; he will also receive an obituary in the next issue of the Chronicle, the University's offical paper.
In regards to how competently the University cares, according to the same article, "The University has also speeded up the process for Tunnel Lights--founded earlier this quarter to educate students about suicide prevention--to become an official RSO." At last week's Inter-House Council Meeting, someone asked what the University is doing to replace Nightline. Evidently, the University is currently working to develop a special telephone menu directory: students will be able to call this number to hear a listing of the phone numbers of useful services (Dean-on-Call, Student Care Center, the drunk van), and hopefully to be connected through to those services. It also plans to create a website with mirroring information. There are no plans to bring back an anonymous, student-run service. For what it's worth, many undergraduate women are members of Rape Victims Advocates, serving at the University of Chicago Hospital and elsewhere in the community. The University's concern that Nightline staffers weren't equipped to handle crises doesn't fit well with that responsibility (fine, train the staffers more).
posted by Amanda Butler |
3/04/2003 12:36:00 AM
Comment </noscript>
Sunday, March 2
Gah! It wasn't my coffee pot that was broken, it was the outlet in the kitchen I plugged my pot into. This I only discover after buying a new Mr. Coffee and throwing the old one out. Sigh... I think the new one is the exact same model and color (white) as Annie's (my old was black). I don't think I would have gotten through my first year without her's. ok, if Sudeep can give bad vibes that disrupt my outlets, maybe she can trigger good studying vibes through the pot.
posted by Amanda Butler |
3/02/2003 12:44:00 PM
Comment </noscript>